Post by Honeylioness on May 11, 2012 22:25:31 GMT -5
This is my response to an article that was sent to me today. The complete article and link to the originating website can be found on the next page.
*******************************************************
I don’t like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same.
This was the statement that struck home with me. I have never felt, or seen any evidence of, either of them wanting to serve the country they are citizens of. Nor do I have the sense, or seen evidence of, that President Obama has any respect for the position he holds. From not placing his hand over his heart during The Pledge, arrogantly putting his feet on the furniture in the Oval Office, his pandering to various international groups and countries and what I see as he unwillingness to put America’s well being and interest above anything else.
For me the first sign that he was primarily interested in how much he wanted to impress the public with how “cool” he seemed was his logo. And the audacity of replacing the American flag on his plane with this fad of “branding” as a tool to market yourself. What does that say to Americans? That we should be ashamed to proudly display our flag and celebrate our citizenship?
And has anyone checked out the official White House website lately? It used to be a good source of factual and historic information with images of the building’s architecture and décor. The whole thing now reads as a rather tacky InfoMercial for two people who come across as needy narcissists. Most of the building and room images contain one or more of them posed in “Aren’t We Wonderful?” stances. I also see them as constantly looking for ways to have the media liberal intelligencia validate them. A tactic I see as people who are so shallow they need to be constantly assured by others in order to have any sense of self worth.
And can anyone tell me why Michelle Obama, or ANY First Lady needs a staff of 22? For what? Making sure that they spell Marc Jacobs and Target correctly when talking about her clothes? I actually would quite happy if our country’s First Lady, no matter who she is, would just focus on her family, be a hostess when needed and not expect that they somehow had be granted some sort of political clout as an unspoken side benefit of her spouse being elected. Since the beginning of the twentieth century I know that many First Ladies have championed causes they believe in: Literacy, Urban Housing or Mental Health. But does supporting a cause and speaking at luncheons really require the tax payer to cover the cost of almost two dozen people to manage that?
Legally, Constitutionally, the First Lady has no official duties. The only duty I believe the public has ever expected from their First Ladies was to be the President’s wife and his hostess for official functions at the White House. In this, Jacqueline Kennedy set the bar fairly high for all those who have, or will, come after. Her poise and reserved demeanor in public created a model which I think many Americans came to expect from the First Lady. Which is not to say that she did not have a projects or interests – she did after all undertake the supervision of the renovations which restored the building and it’s décor to a more historically accurate and elegant look.
And okay – Michelle Obama has chosen Child Health as her focus. That’s fine. We should encourage parents to help their children make better choices about food and activity. I have no problem with that. But she seems to be focused on many other self-promoting activities and not so focused on her children. She moved her mother into the White House to act as a free baby sitter and child care provider. And she seems to be the primary point person for their school activities.
More troubling to me is the following quote from a Chicago newspaper:
Glued to the first family, she's not (Michelle’s mother). Michelle Obama told Women's Health Magazine last year that "Grandma" doesn't always eat dinner with the four of them so they can have a "chance to bond." March 08, 2010|By Katherine Skiba, Chicago Tribune reporter.
Does it strike anyone else as sad that a mother needs to make special arrangements to bond with her own children? It does me, but then in current society it seems to me we have more people focusing on their own careers and desires for money and status – so that the role of “parent” has been downgraded to a minor and not very important part of their lives. Not that many parents I know under the age of 40 or so seem to truly understand proper discipline for their children.
So I agree with the author. It is time for these two people to leave MY White House and for the country to elect a President I do not feel the need to apologize for.
*******************************************
Sources:
data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1962281_2053916,00.html
millercenter.org/president/kennedy/essays/firstlady
*******************************************************
I don’t like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same.
This was the statement that struck home with me. I have never felt, or seen any evidence of, either of them wanting to serve the country they are citizens of. Nor do I have the sense, or seen evidence of, that President Obama has any respect for the position he holds. From not placing his hand over his heart during The Pledge, arrogantly putting his feet on the furniture in the Oval Office, his pandering to various international groups and countries and what I see as he unwillingness to put America’s well being and interest above anything else.
For me the first sign that he was primarily interested in how much he wanted to impress the public with how “cool” he seemed was his logo. And the audacity of replacing the American flag on his plane with this fad of “branding” as a tool to market yourself. What does that say to Americans? That we should be ashamed to proudly display our flag and celebrate our citizenship?
And has anyone checked out the official White House website lately? It used to be a good source of factual and historic information with images of the building’s architecture and décor. The whole thing now reads as a rather tacky InfoMercial for two people who come across as needy narcissists. Most of the building and room images contain one or more of them posed in “Aren’t We Wonderful?” stances. I also see them as constantly looking for ways to have the media liberal intelligencia validate them. A tactic I see as people who are so shallow they need to be constantly assured by others in order to have any sense of self worth.
And can anyone tell me why Michelle Obama, or ANY First Lady needs a staff of 22? For what? Making sure that they spell Marc Jacobs and Target correctly when talking about her clothes? I actually would quite happy if our country’s First Lady, no matter who she is, would just focus on her family, be a hostess when needed and not expect that they somehow had be granted some sort of political clout as an unspoken side benefit of her spouse being elected. Since the beginning of the twentieth century I know that many First Ladies have championed causes they believe in: Literacy, Urban Housing or Mental Health. But does supporting a cause and speaking at luncheons really require the tax payer to cover the cost of almost two dozen people to manage that?
Legally, Constitutionally, the First Lady has no official duties. The only duty I believe the public has ever expected from their First Ladies was to be the President’s wife and his hostess for official functions at the White House. In this, Jacqueline Kennedy set the bar fairly high for all those who have, or will, come after. Her poise and reserved demeanor in public created a model which I think many Americans came to expect from the First Lady. Which is not to say that she did not have a projects or interests – she did after all undertake the supervision of the renovations which restored the building and it’s décor to a more historically accurate and elegant look.
And okay – Michelle Obama has chosen Child Health as her focus. That’s fine. We should encourage parents to help their children make better choices about food and activity. I have no problem with that. But she seems to be focused on many other self-promoting activities and not so focused on her children. She moved her mother into the White House to act as a free baby sitter and child care provider. And she seems to be the primary point person for their school activities.
More troubling to me is the following quote from a Chicago newspaper:
Glued to the first family, she's not (Michelle’s mother). Michelle Obama told Women's Health Magazine last year that "Grandma" doesn't always eat dinner with the four of them so they can have a "chance to bond." March 08, 2010|By Katherine Skiba, Chicago Tribune reporter.
Does it strike anyone else as sad that a mother needs to make special arrangements to bond with her own children? It does me, but then in current society it seems to me we have more people focusing on their own careers and desires for money and status – so that the role of “parent” has been downgraded to a minor and not very important part of their lives. Not that many parents I know under the age of 40 or so seem to truly understand proper discipline for their children.
So I agree with the author. It is time for these two people to leave MY White House and for the country to elect a President I do not feel the need to apologize for.
*******************************************
Sources:
data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1962281_2053916,00.html
millercenter.org/president/kennedy/essays/firstlady